Digging Darwin

Photo of Quenda (Western Australian Bandicoot)

Eastern bared bandicoot 

Charles Darwin fundamentally changed how we see ourselves as human creatures by listening to evidence laid out by the animals that surround us. The beaks of different finch species that populate the Galápagos Islands told the astounding story of speciation and adaptation. But before, during and after the study of  finches there were earthworms, and following  the publication of “Origin of the Species”(1859) came”The Formation of Vegetable Mould through the Action of Worms, with Observations on Their Habits” (1881). This  book was a bestseller, gathering the results of four decades of study, Darwin having first published on worms in 1837.

Darwin was following a hunch that soil fertility was a product of bioturbation, now specifically called biopedturbation since there are now half a dozen different categories of bioturbation recognised.  The added “ped” refers specifically to the mixing of soil by animals. It’s also possible to mix marine sediments, etc. 

Apart from exploring fundamental ideas about the nature of life, Darwin also succeeded in bringing ideas to public attention by arousing curiosity and involving others in his research. Darwin might have also started the first citizen science project by appealing for worm casting data from collaborators around the globe.His family members collected data on worm castings for him and went to the extent of conducting  experiments testing the hearing of worms by playing musical instruments of different types. Worms turn out to be deaf.

Among many findings, Darwin calculated that worms in his locale were responsible for moving soil to the surface of a paddock in the order of 160 tons per acre per year. Worms were cast as the bio-engineers of soil fertility. The stuff Darwin called ‘vegetable mould’ was the organically altered pre-digested dark soil horizon in which plant roots thrived. Worms built the fertile soils that supported English agriculture.

In Darwin’s time worms were regarded as pests, only responsible for unsightly mounds of castings. In the end, Darwin the conservationist told his son William, what he hoped his book would reveal is that ‘worms have much bigger souls than anyone would suppose’.

Darwin made the utility of ecology evident, with worms as providers of ‘eco-system services’. Bandicoots likewise are among a whole suite of small native animals that tilled the Australian soil, keeping it in better condition for supporting plant life.

In the Australian context, soil structure is markedly different to that found in rural England. It should come as no surprise that soils that are frequently dry do not support the same populations of earthworms. Nor is there generally the same rich banding of soil horizons. Yet there is still bioturbation at play, where worms are absent, ants may carry out the work of dragging stuff in and out of the ground. Or larger burrowing animals may be at work. Bandicoots have long thin snouts which they insert into the soil to sense food items, they will then dig to retrieve the food. The ground is left pockmarked as if giant earthworms were at play.

British settlers brought with them a slew of animals to recreate home. Some, like rabbits, are master bioengineers which had coevolved with foxes, digging extensive burrows for safety. Feral cats and foxes do hunt rabbits but disproportionately ravage native mammal populations. Australian small mammals have  suffered the largest extinction rates of anywhere in the world during  the colonial era. Three species are confirmed as extinct in the last decade.

Thirty three species of Australian mammals have been lost since settlement. This includes four distinct species of geographically isolated barred bandicoots. Specimens remain only in museum drawers. The Eastern barred bandicoot once found on the mainland is now restricted to Tasmania where foxes are absent. 

Other bandicoot species perhaps with greater ability to seek cover from predators will still emerge from bushland or from underneath buildings to dig holes into paddocks or lawns seeking a meal of invertebrates,  including the odd juicy worm. 

The declining condition of Australian soils has created a business opportunity for those who would offset carbon emissions by increasing soil carbon sequestration. As in Darwin’s time the public are ready to have the good news explained, there are animals who usefully dig the soil and they possess a soul bigger than you may suppose.

Bandicoot holes Wollumboola NSW 2022

Posts

Frog offsets: too good to be true

Green and golden bell frog, Ranoidea aurea NSW status, Endangered. Commonwealth status, Vulnerable.

Eats insects, worms and small vertebrates. Sunbakes to aid digestion.

Tadpoles take 3-11 months to mature.

Classification

A ground dwelling frog in the tree frog family, one of Australia’s largest frogs the adults are between 4.5-11cm in size.

Very similar to other frogs in the Ranoidea genus, the green and golden bell frog is able to hybridise and is often found together with the closely related growling grass frog (R. castanea) and yellow spotted bell frog (R. raniformis).

“The species is now classified within the Ranoidea aurea complex, a closely related group of frogs in the genus Ranoidea.[4] This complex is scattered throughout Australia: three species occur in south-east Australia, one in northern Australia, and two in Southwest Australia.”

Ranoidea aurea is equally and most closely related to R. castanea and R. raniformis. A microcomplement fixation technique using serum albumins has indicated the species closest to R. aurea is R. ranifomis. Albumin immunological distance data suggest no differentiation between the two, and the green and golden bell frog evolutionally separated from the other two species about 1.1 million years ago.”

From the Wikipedia entry on the green and golden bell frog (GGBF)

Offsets

The GGBF faces steep population declines in the remaining habitat, and is listed as endangered in NSW, where threats to biodiversity are largely managed with an “offset” mechanism. The Biodiversity Offset Market puts a monetary value onto threatened species and their habitat, this can be used to draw up compensation deals. These values are known as “species credits” and given that the market has been established by government to facilitate development in environmentally sensitive areas, outcomes favour developers. The cost of offsets is never a deterrent to a major development because the rules will be altered in such cases. There’s been no recorded improvement in environmental outcomes using an offset scheme, for frogs or any other species, anywhere, ever.

The market price on endangered frogs fluctuates depending on supply and demand for sites to be destroyed versus sites that might potentially be saved. We could speculate that the price should also reflect frog population health and numbers, but it’s unlikely that populations are monitored sufficiently to establish if offsets are effective. When it rains do the prices go down as more frogs reproduce? When it’s dry do prices go up as frogs perish? As frogs head to extinction does the price reflect the intrinsic value of another lost species. Does any of this economic activity increase the extent of frog habitat? Probably not, but it provides job opportunities for biologists who might otherwise raise concerns about development threats.

According to wikipedia, only 40 sites remain where GGBFs can be found. However species credit market prices dealing in habitat loss continue to fluctuate. How is it that the habitat market offset price can rise and fall while habitat loss continues in one direction?

On the 11th Nov 2022 species credit price for the green and golden bell frog was $22,348. The most recent sale of GGBF species credits on 28th Oct 2024 was $1,651, a 93% fall in value, yet the underlying conservation concerns are as dire as ever, chytrid fungus and habitat destruction remain as major threats.

No one can properly explain the species market, but green and golden bell frogs remain endangered and have vanished entirely from 90% of its previous recorded range. Meanwhile several government enquires at state and federal level have established that the biodiversity offset market is a failed concept.

Wetlands

The key to conservation is protecting habitat. Wetlands provide habitat for frogs but are just as crucial for birds, and frogs provide protein for birds. It’s entirely possible for an endangered bird to eat an endangered frog, such are the complications of conservation and over reliance on a diminishing area of suitable habitat.

Kooragang Island is one of three East Australian Islands where GGBF are found, and also major industrial hub. In 1983 a Kooragang wetlands rehabilitation and nature reserve were formed. 1984 it was declared a Ramsar site of 2926 hectares.

“The Hunter Estuary Wetlands Ramsar site is extremely important as both a feeding and roosting site for a large seasonal population of shorebirds and as a waylay site for transient migrants. Over 250 species of birds have been recorded within the Ramsar site, including 45 species listed under international migratory conservation agreements. In addition, the Ramsar site provides habitat for the nationally threatened Green and Golden Bell Frog, Estuary Stingray and Australasian Bittern.” Aust Gov DCCEEW 2019

Sources

https://www.dcceew.gov.au/environment/biodiversity/threatened/publications/factsheet-frogs-australia#:~:text=Australia’s%20frogs%20vary%20in%20size,is%20only%2014%20millimetres%20long.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Green_and_golden_bell_frog

https://australian.museum/learn/animals/frogs/green-and-golden-bell-frog/

https://www.environment.gov.au/cgi-bin/wetlands/ramsardetails.pl?refcode=24

Posts